Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- 5_fichiers:fontes:ou_sont_les_fontes_am [2018/06/03 14:58]
joseph.wright
+++ 5_fichiers:fontes:ou_sont_les_fontes_am [2018/06/03 16:18]
samcarter
@@ Ligne 4: / Ligne 4: @@
 tags: deprecated
 permalink: /FAQ-amfonts
+date: 2014-06-10
 ---
@@ Ligne 9: / Ligne 10: @@
 series of fonts.  The initials stood for "Almost [Computer] Modern",
 and they were the predecessors of the Computer Modern fonts that we
-all know and love (or hate)<sup class="fmk">&dagger;</sup>.
+all know and love (or hate)
+<sup class="fmk">&dagger;</sup><span class="footnote">&dagger;
+  The fonts acquired their label "Almost" following the realisation
+  that their first implementation in MetaFont79 still wasn't quite right;
+  Knuth's original intention had been that they were the final answer.
+</span>.
 There's not a lot one can do with these
 fonts; they are (as their name implies) almost (but not quite) the
@@ Ligne 15: / Ligne 21: @@
 them, the only reasonable approach is to edit the document to replace
 `am*` font names with `cm*`.
-  > &dagger;
-  > The fonts acquired their label "Almost" following the realisation
-  > that their first implementation in MetaFont79 still wasn't quite right;
-  > Knuth's original intention had been that they were the final answer.
 The appearance of DVI files that request them is sufficiently